Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpTgyQV3/AAECC.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(store, m, false) → EMPTY(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)))
IF2(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
IF1(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
IF1(store, m, true) → FSTSPLIT(m, store)
APP(cons(h, t), x) → APP(t, x)
IF1(store, m, true) → EMPTY(fstsplit(m, store))
IF1(store, m, true) → IF2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
IF1(store, m, false) → IF3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
PROCESS(store, m) → LEQ(m, length(store))
LEQ(s(n), s(m)) → LEQ(n, m)
IF3(store, m, false) → SNDSPLIT(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))
IF3(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), store)
LENGTH(cons(h, t)) → LENGTH(t)
IF1(store, m, false) → FSTSPLIT(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))
IF2(store, m, false) → SNDSPLIT(m, store)
IF3(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
FSTSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → FSTSPLIT(n, t)
IF3(store, m, false) → PROCESS(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)
PROCESS(store, m) → LENGTH(store)
MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → MAP_F(pid, t)
IF2(store, m, false) → PROCESS(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
IF2(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store))
MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → APP(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
IF1(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), store)
PROCESS(store, m) → IF1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
SNDSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → SNDSPLIT(n, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(store, m, false) → EMPTY(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)))
IF2(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
IF1(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
IF1(store, m, true) → FSTSPLIT(m, store)
APP(cons(h, t), x) → APP(t, x)
IF1(store, m, true) → EMPTY(fstsplit(m, store))
IF1(store, m, true) → IF2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
IF1(store, m, false) → IF3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
PROCESS(store, m) → LEQ(m, length(store))
LEQ(s(n), s(m)) → LEQ(n, m)
IF3(store, m, false) → SNDSPLIT(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))
IF3(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), store)
LENGTH(cons(h, t)) → LENGTH(t)
IF1(store, m, false) → FSTSPLIT(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))
IF2(store, m, false) → SNDSPLIT(m, store)
IF3(store, m, false) → MAP_F(self, nil)
FSTSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → FSTSPLIT(n, t)
IF3(store, m, false) → PROCESS(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)
PROCESS(store, m) → LENGTH(store)
MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → MAP_F(pid, t)
IF2(store, m, false) → PROCESS(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
IF2(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store))
MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → APP(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
IF1(store, m, false) → APP(map_f(self, nil), store)
PROCESS(store, m) → IF1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
SNDSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → SNDSPLIT(n, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 7 SCCs with 15 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP(cons(h, t), x) → APP(t, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

APP(cons(h, t), x) → APP(t, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(APP(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → MAP_F(pid, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MAP_F(pid, cons(h, t)) → MAP_F(pid, t)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_2
POL(MAP_F(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(cons(h, t)) → LENGTH(t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LENGTH(cons(h, t)) → LENGTH(t)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(LENGTH(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + (4)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LEQ(s(n), s(m)) → LEQ(n, m)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

LEQ(s(n), s(m)) → LEQ(n, m)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(LEQ(x₁, x₂)) = (3)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SNDSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → SNDSPLIT(n, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

SNDSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → SNDSPLIT(n, t)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(SNDSPLIT(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (3)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FSTSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → FSTSPLIT(n, t)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FSTSPLIT(s(n), cons(h, t)) → FSTSPLIT(n, t)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(FSTSPLIT(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + (3)x_2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(store, m, true) → IF2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
IF1(store, m, false) → IF3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
IF2(store, m, false) → PROCESS(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
PROCESS(store, m) → IF1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
IF3(store, m, false) → PROCESS(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

fstsplit(0, x) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
fstsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → cons(h, fstsplit(n, t))
sndsplit(0, x) → x
sndsplit(s(n), nil) → nil
sndsplit(s(n), cons(h, t)) → sndsplit(n, t)
empty(nil) → true
empty(cons(h, t)) → false
leq(0, m) → true
leq(s(n), 0) → false
leq(s(n), s(m)) → leq(n, m)
length(nil) → 0
length(cons(h, t)) → s(length(t))
app(nil, x) → x
app(cons(h, t), x) → cons(h, app(t, x))
map_f(pid, nil) → nil
map_f(pid, cons(h, t)) → app(f(pid, h), map_f(pid, t))
process(store, m) → if1(store, m, leq(m, length(store)))
if1(store, m, true) → if2(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, store)))
if1(store, m, false) → if3(store, m, empty(fstsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store))))
if2(store, m, false) → process(app(map_f(self, nil), sndsplit(m, store)), m)
if3(store, m, false) → process(sndsplit(m, app(map_f(self, nil), store)), m)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.